« hint hint | Main | lèse majesté american style »

midterm election tidbits

Control of the Senate now hangs on the results in Virginia, where the results are so close that a recount is mandatory.
A variety of voting equipment includes several kinds of ballotless voting computers which can’t be meaningfully recounted. There is no way to prove that these machines registered and tallied votes correctly. Avi Rubin has more on this.

In Connecticut, Joe Lieberman beat Ned Lamont thanks to the Republicans who flocked to his side. Anyone who doesn’t understand that he is, in fact, a Republican should have gotten it by now. If Allen wins in Virginia, I won’t be surprised if Lieberman suddenly discovers a compelling reason to abandon his pledge to caucus with Democrats and joins the Republicans instead, because with the majority party he can do more for the people of Connecticut and for the soul of man. With Joe, there’s always a higher purpose and he knows what it is before anyone else. If he doesn’t bolt on his own, the Dems should kick him out. Better to stabbed in the front than the back; it’s easier to pull the knife out.

In neighboring Rhode Island, my home state, they had the opposite problem: a liberal Republican bearing a beloved political name. At last my fellow Rhode Islanders wised up and realized that despite his voting record and the name, Lincoln Chafee was helping the Republicans stay in power and that’s why the GOP backed him to the hilt. I saw Democratic winner at a cheese-sandwich lunch on Providence’s East Side and he seemed like a decent guy, aside from disgracefully pandering on the bombing of Lebanon to a presumably heavily Jewish audience. At least he won’t be running for president anytime soon. Not with a name like Sheldon Whitehouse anyway. No, he’s Episcopalian.

Here in Pennsylvania, as everyone from here to Pluto knows, the odious Sen. Rick Santorum (come on, click it!) will soon be taking over some of the home-schooling, if the way his son cried during the concession speech is any indication. If only there had been a way for him to lose without Bob Casey Jr winning, my day would have been bright indeed. The way the Democratic party leadership rammed that empty-suited legacy down the Pennsylvania voters’ collective throat was a scandal that proves they deserve to be called the Democrat Party.

Check out this glossy flyer we received a few days before the election. For a few minutes I thought the GOP was handing them out to discourage Democrats from coming out.

Why are so many Republicans supporting Bob Casey?

Yes, why are they? Well, let’s see, he’s anti-choice, pro-war, and, ah, white? Sold me. Actually, what turned me off was the picture on the left, the one where he’s chatting with the black/Asian interracial lesbian parents of a cross-racially adopted white baby. He’s laughing because they said something about getting married before Bob Casey III gets into office.

(So what is it with these legacy candidates? While Bob Casey, son of former governor Bob Casey was running for Senate in Pennsylvania while in New Jersey it was Tom Kean, son of former governor Tom Kean. And the aforementioned Lincoln Chafee, son of John. The list goes on and on. It’s turning into a permanent nobility around here.)

One Congressional hopeful who was left standing on the platform as the Democratic train chugged away was Lois Murphy (PA-6), who appeared to lose to Republican incumbent Jim Gerlach by only just over 1% of the vote. Murphy was roundly criticized by voters in and near her district for a flood of robocalls in the last few days of the campaign. It turns out that these calls, which began with a claim they are giving”information about Lois Murphy,” actually came from the National Republican Congressional Committee. Who knows if 3000 potential Murphy voters were so annoyed that they withheld their votes from her.

I really would like to see some serious research into the robocalling phenomenon and its impact. If I had been a fence-sitter who voted for Gerlach over Murphy because of these annoying calls, I would want his head on a pike.

Posted on Wednesday, November 8, 2006 at 05:09PM by Registered Commentercitizen-viewer in | Comments2 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

I sent this comment to The Trumpet:

What ever happened to this, from the page on our beliefs, and from the Bible?

"We believe Christians are forbidden to kill (Exod. 20:13) or in any manner directly or indirectly take human life. We believe bearing arms is contrary to this doctrine; we therefore conscientiously refuse to bear arms or to come under military authority. Christians are, in fact, citizens of another government (John 18:36; Heb. 11:13-16)."

Are many of those sent to Iraq not Christians? Does this mean that President Bush and his generals are not Christians?

I think that it should appear on their comments page: http://www.thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=letters&id=3023 unless they don't approve of it.
Nov 16, 2006 at 08:52AM | Registered Commentercitizen-viewer

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.