« symbol subversion | Main | happy birthday, war »

an historian's perspective

“Never before has this happened,” said Anthony Bykerk, the secretary general of the International Society of Olympic Historians, of the protests surrounding the Olympic torch. “This is the first time that the torch relay has ever been an element of protest — it’s usually a very big celebration.”

While protests and political agendas have often come to the forefront during and leading up to Olympics, said Bykerk, the events of the past couple of days — and the San Francisco incident — are especially troubling.

“This is worse because now they are protesting against the torch relay, which has nothing to do with politics but is supposed to be a symbol of unity — not used as protest,” said Bykerk. “If these people want to protest against the human rights question in Tibet, they should have done it 50 years ago.

Posted on Tuesday, April 8, 2008 at 10:02AM by Registered Commentercitizen-viewer in , | Comments2 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Protesting the Olympic Torch relay as a means of expressing outrage at China over its human rights record (in Tibet and elsewhere) is something only a liberal would love.

It is flashy - and has no real cost and has no real impact.
Apr 8, 2008 at 04:47PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn
Well, given that it was covered in the media worldwide and brought Tibet to the attention of people who probably had no idea that there was even an issue there, I'd say it had a pretty good impact.
Apr 24, 2008 at 09:44AM | Unregistered CommenterSarah

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.