« DSM: a funeral, not a wake | Main | corporal punishment »

DSM: Obama won on Friday

Three days after Sarah Palin’s nomination it’s clear that she is damaged goods. Pick your poison: secessionist (member of Alaskan Independence Party), abuse of power (troopergate), corrupt liar (said she was against Ted Stevens’ bridge to nowhere, was actually for it, and worked for Stevens as late as 2005), family values trouble (no need to explain).

Palin completely undermines the McCain campaign’s attack on Obama as one more elitist Democratic dissembler who is unfit to govern, unpatriotic and probably a commie. She also throws the GOP off their game entirely. Hurricane Gustav is no longer the reason to scale back the convention. Getting the GOP leadership away from the press is. The Repubs can’t find anyone willing to vouch for Palin, and they won’t let her go before the mikes on her own.

Even a hasty withdrawal leaves them stumped. McCain as the wise and experienced leader is now shattered like a thing that shatters a lot, and there’s no putting it back together.

Call it a forced error, however, as the Democratic convention was so impressive that it likely panicked McCain to go for the unknown. For a couple of days it worked. Before the reporters got on the story, Palin as presented by McCain got a lot of positive press and stomped on the post-convention coverage. She even had some thinking that Hillary voters were up for grabs again, notwithstanding Hillary and Bill’s efforts in Denver. That’s all so Sunday’s news now.

Trying to bury the news about Palin underneath the hurricane didn’t work, as first the storm was going to mess with the Republican convention, then it was going to show McCain’s leadership, and now as something less than a Biblical Flood it’s not providing enough cover for Palin’s dirty laundry truck and speculation on McCain’s decision to choose her as the worst mistake in US political history.

Call me a pie-eyed optimist, but it’s over. The good thing is that there are two months of delicious GOP unravelling ahead. McCain was never the favorite of the insiders. Notice that when he called Palin they made it clear it was his choice and his alone. They rallied around him after Super Tuesday, but will they do it again now that all is lost? It’s possible that the hard right might make Johnny walk the plank all on his lonesome so as to be able to say he wasn’t their man and therefore the “dream will never die,” to quote Ted Kennedy.

The prospect of a real GOP food fight, what we might have expected back in January, is so good that I had to come back here. Stay tuned.

Posted on Monday, September 1, 2008 at 11:47PM by Registered CommenterDwight “Sausage” McGraw in | Comments5 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

You are a pie-eyed optimist.

With the possible exception of Kennedy/Johnson, no VP choice has decided the election in living memory.

Palin's problems may make her selection a wash and not an asset, but it will not decide the election.

Unless Toopergate gets some real traction prior to November, it won't hurt McCain.

Show me a presidential or VP candidate who hasn't supported pork and I will call you a liar.

And the public doesn't know anything about the Alaskan Independence Party and cares less. Unless you can show they were planning an armed uprising and she claims her training for that qualifies as military leadership experience it is not going to be important.

Bush's opponents kept dismissing him as an idiot and we ended up with 8 years of him. If you write-off the McCain candidacy as finished we could end up with 4-8 years of him.

As a great philosopher once said, "It ain't over 'til it’s over."
Sep 2, 2008 at 08:45PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn
Good points all John, but I'll try and defend myself nonetheless.

Here's what Palin has done: change the subject. The Repubs were getting to even with Obama by running him down, and now their whole storyline of anti-Obamism has been put on hiatus while McCain does an about face and attacks the media for covering Palin (Obama showed his skills by disavowing the pregnancy attack ASAP). The polls have a big spread and we've got at least the rest of the week before Palin settles into obscurity. In a race where the GOP has to never stop stabbing to win, taking a holiday is fatal.

Keeping the cuts coming was the idea behind picking Palin. Her nomination stomped on the post-convention coverage and for 24 hours it helped reinforce the idea that Obama was just media show. Palin turned out to too good, however, as she has made the race about McCain and that's a loser.

Worse Palin has loads of negatives that will only get buried as long as she stays buried. That is, if she goes on the attack or shows up for interviews, she gets asked about this stuff and it's back to square one. If she gets whisked off to Siberia, make that Alaska, then McCain's back to his old tricks minus a key implicit claim to his campaign, he's got wisdom. "Oh yeah, where's the vp?"

I get our pount that in a Republican-friendly media world most of Palin's screw ups may never get covered or will get her favorable press, but there's a limit to how much the right's institutional sand traps (media, money, courts and cops) can help them. As Rove said in 2006, those things only work in close elections.

McCain has to keep this close. He has to keep Obama looking vulnerable, not inevitable. Once Obama looks like he really is the likely winner, McCain looks diminished, like he does right now.

I think Palin has opened enough daylight for Obama to claim the majority and never give it up.

All that said, my near and dear ones often get on me for the very same reason you raise--assuming we gonna win this time because they are so nuts. Truth be told I've got a horrible track record with that kind of thing as my Gore in 04 and Kerry/Edwards 08 memorabilia can attest.

Still, sometimes the other guys f--- it up big time, and they really aren't indestructible geniuses. Social Security, Katrina, Mark Foley, to name three. This is another one.
Sep 2, 2008 at 10:01PM | Registered CommenterDwight “Sausage” McGraw
The biggest hit that Palin causes is on McCain's vetting and/or judgment. She has issues, but her biggest is her lack of experience.

One problem with choosing such an “outsider” is that they haven’t been exposed to the media pressure that a major politician has. For the last year or more every media outlet has looked at Obama and McCain and the chance that something big and ugly showing up now is unlikely. Likewise Biden has had years of scrutiny – as have rumored Republican VP nominees such as Ridge and Lieberman. Good or bad, the other three ticket leaders have been scrutinized and you know roughly what their history is and their family’s history as well.

If McCain had chosen a Republican with more big league experience that would have reinforced the charge that Obama is too inexperienced to be President. And that is the strongest attack they can make against him because it has some truth to it. (In the interest of full disclosure, I support Obama mainly because he is not McCain, aka Bush 2.0. And I would not support McCain regardless of his running mate.)

And while it is smart politically to disavow attacks on Palin’s daughter, it also the right thing to do. She is not running for anything and there are distinct limits as to how much a parent can be held responsible for their children’s actions. (I am not referring to the parents being legally open to civil suits for the actions of minor children.)

It is true that Obama has opened an 8 point lead, but if Obama and company don’t step up their game they may not hold it. So far they have had few effective ads.

There is a lot to attack McCain on, especially since he has run towards Bush and his positions since he wrapped up the nomination. Bush has the lowest approval rating of any president since modern polling started; tie Bush and McCain together in the publics mind.

As a minor point I would love for Obama to hammer away at McCain’s not knowing how many houses he and his wife own. That shows either he has memory problems or that McCain really doesn’t “feel” the common man’s pain because he has such extensive holdings he can’t keep track of them. To be honest, no one running for president, at least on a major party ticket, leads a life like the common person and I am not sure it is all that important. However, Obama’s supposedly being out of touch with the “real” people is the basis for McCain’s major anti-Obama ads so far, so anything that shows the claim to be worthless is good.

The Republican political operatives are not geniuses, but many of them are very good at what they do. Writing them off as certain to lose is much too dangerous to do. Assume they are geniuses and work that much harder to defeat them.
Sep 2, 2008 at 10:59PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn
Absolutely. Work hard no matter what they do.
Sep 2, 2008 at 11:23PM | Registered CommenterDwight “Sausage” McGraw
I saw a new (or at least new to me) Obama ad.

It was based on the old song "I don't know much..." with new lyrics. Besides being fun it, ties McCain to Bush (it ends with McCain embracing Bush) and raises questions about McCain's abilities.

I liked it. I hope undecideds find it as effective as I did.
Sep 3, 2008 at 01:49PM | Unregistered CommenterJohn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.